patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Forks Approves Additional Public Works Funding

Forks Township finance director comes up with plan for additional $1.6 million to cover additional costs on new public works garage.

 

Editor's Note -- This is the first of a four-part series taking a look at Forks Township's new public works facility.

Forks Township's new public works facility is supposed to be state-of-the-art.

And that tag usually means costly -- as in $1.6 million over budget.

But Forks Township Finance Director James Farley recently came up with a way to cover that $1.6 milllion without the project having more of an impact on taxpayers, who were already on the hook for $4 million.

With some fine line item maneuvers, Farley -- with an assist from Township Manager John Cornell -- believes he closed the gap.

The township is taking from three funding sources: $942,000 from its old sewer authority account, borrowing $500,000 from the general fund over a 20-year period at 1 percent interest, and transfering $240,386 from capital reserve.

"I think we have a close number that I feel pretty confident that we'll meet our budget amount," he said.

  • Are you fine with the public works building cost?

    (Voting has been closed for this question)
    • Yes, it will be a great building.
        3 (50%)
    • No, the cost is way too high.
        3 (50%)
    • Other. Leave your comment.
        0 (0%)
    Total votes: 6
  • Your vote will only count once. This is not a scientific poll. View Results Vote!
Related Topics: Forks Township, John Cornell, and forks township public works building

Rob Leiser

9:27 am on Wednesday, September 5, 2012

Green No, Ecological Disaster Yes, The thousands of Gallons of fuel used to dig this big hole in the ground, could have heated a normal building for a dozen years. The Carbon Footprint is as big as the Hole. In the end we will have a 7 million dollar Mushroom Farm.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Periscope

11:47 am on Wednesday, September 5, 2012

Leiser, how much diesel fuel was used to construct the Sullivan/Meco traffic light in front of your business? What was the value of the driveway improvements to your equipment rental business? This was paid for by taxpayers and we want to know why you hate everything the township does. Perhaps the reason for your comment is because the contractors building the garage didn’t come to you for the earth moving equipment you rent that runs on salad oil! The work crews that keep our roads clean and in good repair deserve a new garage and I am sure they will not be pleased with your attitude. Next time we have a heavy snow, better have your bio fuel snow plows at the ready to remove the big snow ridges across your driveways.

Comment_arrow

Molly

8:31 am on Tuesday, September 18, 2012

Periscope - the PW director never wanted this $4M+ hole in the ground. They asked for a new building, because the current building is beyond repair. I have no doubt he would have been happy with a pole barn and working restroom for his employees.

Perhaps they could build the new skate park behind your house since you're so willing to endorse large scale projects in residential neighborhoods?

Carrie Bachman

9:57 am on Wednesday, September 5, 2012

I'd love to rant about this too, but what's done is done. Moving forward, I hope to see the following:
- Better attendance at Board of Supervisors (BOS) meetings (1st & 3rd Thursdays at 7:30 in the Community Center);
- That those who can't attend meetings will hear the recorded versions at http://www.forkstownship.org/bosaudio.html, or read the minutes at http://www.forkstownship.org/minutes.html;
- That residents will keep abreast of changes by bookmarking and visiting the very informative www.forkstownship.org;
- That residents will ask questions/voice opinions to the BOS via e-mail (David Billings - dbillings@forkstownship.org, Erik Chuss - echuss@forkstownship.org, Robert Egolf - regolf@forkstownship.org, Dan Martyak - dmartyak@earthlink.net, and John O'Neil - John40@rcn.com); and
- That the BOS will put the taxpayers' interests first in future decisions.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Molly

8:14 am on Tuesday, September 18, 2012

Emailing the supervisors means they should respond? Good luck with that.

Patch_comments_icon

Dino Ciliberti

9:59 am on Wednesday, September 5, 2012

And that the public can be informed about Forks Township by reading Patch.com

Reply

Periscope

11:20 am on Wednesday, September 5, 2012

What happened to Forks transparency?
Carrie, you mean well and I applaud your comments. Keep the pressure up. But sorry to disappoint you. The grand supers have reduced meetings to one board meeting and one general all hands meeting per month. This goes counter to all principals of transparency and public participation in debate. Public comment is watered down to one meeting a month. To make things worse, super Chuss from his high chair has ruled that there will be no public comment or even questions from the public attending this grand committee of the “whole”. In fact no minutes are taken nor a recording made of the discussions. This is contrary to all things democratic. This broad is going backward and each super is avoiding their responsibility to keep residents informed and allow for public discussion. Just look at the past agendas. They are posted on the website late in the week and the agenda language is so vague that the public has no idea what is under discussion. Chuss as chairman is responsible for this growing detachment of supers from the people they represent. Chuss, Billings and Egolf are up for re election. They must be held accountable for this deterioration of transparency.

Reply

Rob Leiser

2:36 pm on Wednesday, September 5, 2012

Dear unwilling to use your own name: this isn’t about Meco Rd or the Fight for my Business against Supervisors who tried to shut down my entrance.

This poll is about the Construction of an extravagant Building that Taxpayers can’t afford. This project wasn’t hid from the public it was out in the open since it‘s inception. I supported the residential neighbors who didn’t want a 24-7 Industrial Operation in there back yards. Unfortunately when those snowplows roll out of the Cave at 2 am and the Salt loading begins those unfortunate Neighbors will all be awoken.

The Building was needed but not at twice the cost of a conventional Building. The Building could have been located on Township Property in the Industrial Park. When you put equipment in a Damp Garage it Rusts. Who added up these costs to dry the building or the damage to the Equipment? Both Taxpayers and Township Employees will be hurt by the costs of this Project.

I have been forced into becoming politically active to save my Business. I, my friends, and customers are one of the reasons we no longer have 2 term Supervisors. Unfortunately we vote for Candidates who promise us something rather then candidates that know the value of a Dollar.

If you want to talk about Meco Rd stop out and see how David Howell and others used the Meco Rd Project to try and damage my Business.

Patch; I am sorry to get off the subject and lets keep the posts on the subject.

Reply

Molly

8:25 am on Tuesday, September 18, 2012

$4M+ dollars for a hole in the ground - in a field that was littered with sink holes prior to this project (one of which is still there). And instead of moving the project closer to Newlins Road, AWAY from a residential neighborhood, the township approved it to be built 50 feet from homes (not a football field as they promised residents). For $4M+ the township could have put up two pole barns, a salt shed, and a restroom/office facility for PW workers on the current property. AND still have money left over for other projects.

Reply

Rob Leiser

10:01 am on Tuesday, September 18, 2012

I doubt that most people remember the old Municipal Building. It was a 2 Story Tornado Proof Building with an elevator. The building housed the Fire Department, Police Department and all the Municipal offices. That Building was torn down because the Supervisors considered it Ugly. The Building was just another usable recourse wasted. Today that Building could have gone a long way in Providing Offices and Garages for Public Works.

Even with the New Public Works Building Forks Township will need to address some other shortcomings. The Current Municipal Building was built without a thought for expansion. The Fire Company has all it’s equipment in a very inaccessible corner of the Township. Instead we are sticking millions into a Building Designed so Supervisors feel good about themselves.

Reply

Leave a comment