'We The People' Rally Against State and Federal Budget Cuts
Organizer urges advocates of a wide range of social and economic issues to unify message.
Holding signs that ranged from pro-union to anti-war, about 50 people attended a rally Saturday at the Rose Garden in Bethlehem to protest state and national budget cuts and corporate tax breaks and loopholes.
The rally was organized by Tom Ulrich, of We The People of Lehigh Valley, which according to its website promotes progressive causes. Ulrich told the gathering to “connect the dots,” to see the links between a wide range of social and economic issues such as unions, public schools, the environment, peace and social justice, and to unify over the impact of state and national budget cuts to these causes.
Ulrich said democracy does not thrive when there is huge economic disparity between people.
Craig Olsen, a naturalist from Lower Saucon Township, said he attended the rally because “I’m really getting fed up with fat cats getting all the breaks and the working people and ordinary people not getting a break.”
Judy Smullen, a retired English teacher from Bethlehem, was among the protestors who lined the 800 block of Union Boulevard. “I think it's appalling that in a time of economic crisis that [some government officials] are trying to destroy unions and the middle class,” Smullen said.
In a rousing speech, Ed Balukas, president of UAW Local 677 in Allentown, criticized Gov. Tom Corbett for not reducing the cost of running his own office and he spoke out against the maligning of teachers in the country. “Teachers are the saviours of this country. They are not the enemy,” he said.
Elisa Zaehringer, advocacy coordinator for the Community Action Committee of the Lehigh Valley, which helps low-income families, told the crowd numerous programs that help disadvantaged people were in danger of being eliminated or cut, including Community Services Block Grants, CACLV’s core funding source.
“I ask you, where are our priorities? The common good is under attack,” Zaehringer said.
“Programs aimed at helping those who are experiencing tough times and attempt to build healthy communities are being slashed while billions of dollars are being given to large corporations who shop jobs overseas and to the wealthiest of Americans in the form of tax breaks. We need to take back democracy and demand a responsible budget from our leaders,” she said.
Rosemary B
8:57 am on Monday, March 21, 2011
What Billions of dollars are being given to large corporations? Please be specific and have a link or bill or law or something to back it up. I am always hearing about this but never provided any proof that it is actually happening. Than k you.
John Thomas
9:02 am on Monday, March 21, 2011
These protesters are the same clowns who bought McMansions they couldn't afford and had them foreclosed on leaving taxpayers to pay their debts and still drove to the ralley in their BMW SUV that they cant afford. These self ritious SOB's should stop whinning about the problem because they are the problem.
Missy Moyer-Schneck
1:51 pm on Monday, March 21, 2011
Yeah, these people rant and go nuts but they can never back anything up.....
Bethlehem Watchdog
7:44 pm on Monday, March 21, 2011
Progressive causes you say? That's it, 50 people? So much for Bethlehem being a hotbed for Liberals! These people are doing nothing but complaining that "their" handouts are now going to corporate fat cats. They should start yelling at liberals in the Congress and Senate for passing the trillion dollar bail out. Imagine if they would have given you "the people" a trillion dollar tax cut!
SABLE
11:06 pm on Thursday, May 16, 2013
The State can try a pilot program which separates from Federal government in order to test a business & financial model. Having a printing press which will gurantee the worth of a dollar, by silver or other precious metals backing.
Other states could join the model for one independent block that can run independent of federally insured funding.
Small businesses return & are given tax breaks for doing so & must use the proceeds by reinvesting them into that business.
Large corporations are not punished but rewarded for supporting the small, vendor; & hiring locally & hostile takeovers are a illegal.
As are monopolies & opolies illegal, as historically they had been or were supposed to be; the reason for big business are due to both. Hostile take overs & the monopolies.
The larger the business, the more employees for which tax credit is given up too the capped amount.
So, that's a BIG idea.
SLP
9:03 pm on Monday, March 21, 2011
http://www.forbes.com/2010/04/01/ge-exxon-walmart-business-washington-corporate-taxes.html
You might want to check this article from Forbes before you all get too excited.
Tom Molinaro
11:14 pm on Monday, March 21, 2011
Thank you for the link, SLP. The Forbes article was thorough and informative.
However, I think you're being overly optimistic in thinking that conservatives will read anything longer than Sarah Palin's Tweets or bumper stickers.
Rosemary B
9:03 am on Tuesday, March 22, 2011
Gee whiz, Look at this. I, a proud CONSERVATIVE read the whole article and found it fascinating! The point of the article seems to be that these big corporations have found a way to pay taxes to other countries because those countries have a lower rate and charge off their losses here at our higher rate! This happens because our corporate taxes are too high! THAT is what need to change so that we can begin collecting the taxes here and not have them being paid overseas!
Here is another fascinating part of the article that people should pay attention to:
"Would no more tax holiday for GE really end up helping Mr. and Mrs. Taxpayer? Doubtful. "The average Joe should be in favor of lower corporate taxes," says Hodge, "because ultimately they are paying the corporate income tax. Either as workers, getting lower wages and fewer jobs, or as consumers, paying higher prices, or as retirees, getting lower dividends and earnings on their investments.""
Rosemary B
8:49 am on Tuesday, March 22, 2011
Tom, your judgmental attitude towards conservatives is far from helpful. I am a proud conservative and have every intention of reading the article. That is why I asked for people to back up their claim with FACTS. We need to all educate our selves on both sides of an issue so that we can come to our own thoughtful conclusions and share the sources of our facts and not just insult each other. That is neither mature or a productive way to move this country forward on a positive path.
Tom Molinaro
10:33 pm on Tuesday, March 22, 2011
Rosemary B (well at least you use part of your real name, better than most of the anonymous bloggers on this site) I appologize if I sounded judgmental. But it gets more than a little frustrating to hear the conservative formula for all problems in America being summed up in two, very short phrases: less taxes, smaller government. Is that all you got?
CPAC should issue every card-carrying a conservative one of those buttons that Staples uses. Only instead of saying "That was easy," when you push it, it would say "No New Taxes." I mean, when there's a surplus the answer is, of course, cut taxess (after all, it's not the government's money). When there's a deficit and two wars going, cut taxes (that will stimulate job growth).
I don't know, it sounds very un-American when conservatives talk about the government as if it's some foreign entity, some invading force of evil. The government is me and you and the rest of the good the God-fearing freedom-loving people in this land. Rememeber that guy Lincoln (who would probably be challenged by the Tea Party in a Repulican Primary today)?
When he described our democracy as "government by the people, of the people, and for the people," I don't think he was talking about Exxon-Mobile or the Koch brothers. But I could be wrong.
Rosemary B
1:14 pm on Wednesday, March 23, 2011
According to this article, Lowering the corporate tax IS a good answer to getting corporations to pay taxes here. Also, the answer does not always have to be "No New Taxes". It can also be "Cut Wasteful Spending!" Taxpayers feel like a father who gives their teenager a sportscar, they crash it and then demand Daddy buy them another! It just cannot go on like this forever. The economy is bad. We are all cutting back. Why is the government not cutting back and living on the ample taxes that they already take in? It is also very frustrating when the President is willing to help BRAZIL drill for their oil and not allow US to drill for ours. That sounds like he is more in favor of a foreign entity then he is in favor of bringing jobs to his own people and lowering gas prices so that OUR economy can grow. Perhaps when OUR government puts OUR needs first we will not feel like they are "an invading force of evil".
Missy Moyer-Schneck
12:40 pm on Tuesday, March 22, 2011
Thankful that the majority of us conservatives are nothing like what Tom suggests and can and do think for ourselves.
Tom Molinaro
11:13 pm on Wednesday, March 23, 2011
I'm not sure how much thinking is used in policies that essentially are devoid of governing. And I'm not talking about conservative bloggers or voters here, I'm talking about our so-called leaders. What was the last inovative idea conservatives have had about governing? If I can make an analogy to physics, I'd say governing is matter (substance) and the conservative idea of governing is anti-matter. F.D.R. gave us Social Security and the Hoover Dam, Ronald Reagan gave us the Laffer curve and trickle down economics. Teddy Roosevelt (another Republican who would face a Tea Party challenge today) gave us The Pure Food and Drug Act and anti-trust laws to curb abusive, monopolistic business practices, while George H.W. Bush gave us "a 1000 points of light." Republicans have no ideas about using government creatively, wisely, humanely. It's all about letting corporations run roughshod over the rest of us, in the name of "freedom." And it all comes down to your definition of that wonderful abstract noun, "freedom." But I think FDR's list sums it up well: Feedom of Speech, Freedom of Worship, Freedom from Fear, and, don't forget Freedom from want.
Rosemary B
8:32 am on Thursday, March 24, 2011
It is not the governments job to provide "freedom from want" or "Freedom from fear".
At what point does a person's lot in life become their own responsibility?
Bethlehem Watchdog
9:49 am on Thursday, March 24, 2011
I don't need the government babysitting or taking care of me. I can stand on my own two feet, thank you very much. What I want is for government to do what its inteded purpose is and for it to stay out of my personal life and stop picking my pocket to reward those who are lazy and don't want to contribute to society.
SABLE
11:21 pm on Thursday, May 16, 2013
Yes & stop funding Homeland Security "The Mother! Guard your mother Land!", as well as TSA. Do you know those xray machines still have not been tested? It's anyone's guess the amount of waves made each time one is used which would, IMO, reach beyond it's small proxcimity; but either way it's a medical device being abused. Who is responsible for liabilities having to do with these "Guard the Motherland from yourself", idea.
The story of Nazi/Hitler/Germany shadows today so closely too; even though a 'hoax' as some call it faux for me, . it's right there for all to see, yet they keep flying, no signs of protest, a robotic state of mind to line-up & wait their turn.
They talk of 'Freedom' on their Capitol there's a female statute named "Freedom" I would guess 1 out of 10 know that she's the devil's wife.
Tom Molinaro
12:11 pm on Thursday, March 24, 2011
Rosemary B and Bethlehem Watchdog (my anonymous friends) we are never going to agree on this.
I will continue to be eternally curious about what makes conservatives tick, and I'm sure you'll keep wondering about liberals. But in this, my final comment on the subject I'll leave you with a quote by Winston Churchill and an afterthought.
"Any man who is under 30, and is not a liberal, has no heart; and any man who is over 30, and is not a conservative, has no brains."
---Winston Churchill
Since I'm well over 30, I guess in the final analysis, I'd rather error on the side of being brainless than heartless.
Thanks for the interesting repartee.
Tom Molinaro
Rosemary B
3:58 pm on Friday, March 25, 2011
And I will leave you with a final thought. Give a man an fish and he eats for a day. Teach a man to fish and he eats the rest of his life. I think it is less heartless to help and expect people to provide for themselves then it is to teach people to be dependent on the government. That is the difference between Liberals and Conservatives.
Thank you for this respectful exchange of ideas. I hope more Librals and Conservatives can have similar exchanges.
Missy Moyer-Schneck
7:26 am on Saturday, March 26, 2011
Interesting discussion, that can go on forever!....seriously though, my ambition in life is to continue my families business without being raped by higher taxes and stronger more involved government. Government needs to back off and let businesses continue to grow without the higher taxes. It's very simple, I work for my family, to feed and clothe them and to hopefully enjoy a trip to the beach every summer, right now, that's not gonna happen with the increases in taxes to my business, I am not working 60 hours a week to feed my neighbor, I'm working to feed my family